For the memory banks. Minor tweet storm about Trump support and the underlying psyc principles.
Starts here:
https://twitter.com/mr_orgue/status/819265590363729920
(I can’t generate the embed code on the app it seems. If I can be bothered I’ll update this later with the embedded tweet.)
Podcast confluence today. I listened to this:
You Are Not So Smart episode 41, which opens with a discussion of a divisive Ivy League football match in 1951, and the studies where students from the two schools watched tape of the match and simply couldn’t see their own side’s poor behaviour but were really quick to spot infractions from the other side.
Then I listened to this:
This American Life: Cops See It Differently, part 2, which opens with a TAL reporter watching the video of Eric Garner’s arrest with her friend the police officer, and her astonishment that they couldn’t agree on what they were seeing.
—
Transcript of the TAL episode is not up as I type but should appear at that link in a few days.
No transcript of the YANSS podcast, but mostly McRaney’s reading from his own book, and the relevant section is conveniently available in this excerpt from the publisher.)
Observation: Chekhov’s gun is to fiction as cognitive dissonance is to life.
(The above probably needs to simmer for a while to reduce into something pithier, but I think the recipe is right.)
(Emerged from an extremely lengthy ramble about a larp game I played on the weekend, which the foolhardy among you can find here.)
Photos uncovered by the National Archives show how the police spied on the suffragettes. These covert images – perhaps the UK’s first spy pictures – have gone on display to mark the centenary of the votes-for-women movement.
Ninety years ago, a Scotland Yard detective submitted an unusual equipment request.
It was passed up the chain, scrutinised, reviewed and finally rubber-stamped in Whitehall itself. Scotland Yard duly became the proud owner of a Ross Telecentric camera lens. And at a cost to the taxpayer of £7, 6s and 11d, secret police photographic surveillance (in the shape of an 11-inch long lens) was born.
Within weeks, the police were using it against what the government then regarded as the biggest threat to the British Empire: the suffragettes.
Documents uncovered at the National Archives reveal that the votes-for-women movement probably became the first “terrorist” organisation subjected to secret surveillance photography in the UK, if not the world.
The BBC photo caption, written by a subeditor:
In 1912, Scotland Yard detectives bought their first camera to covertly photograph the suffragettes.
Nope. Scotland Yard had cameras in use by 1888, as anyone who is brave enough to google “Mary Kelly” will discover. A quarter-century later they finally began to use cameras for surveillance.
But, everywhere else:
In 1912, Scotland Yard detectives bought their first camera, to covertly photograph suffragettes. – The BBC
That subeditor’s error in the photo caption wasn’t accidental. The idea that an entire new technology was first brought to bear as a means of suppressing dissent and protest? That’s our current moment affecting their assumptions about what has happened in the past. Stories corrupt across multiple tellings in predictable ways; most obviously they change in order to fit with our expectations and beliefs. Even an instance as small as this is not entirely harmless – right now there’s someone out there forming the belief that law enforcement’s eternal priority is to crush dissent on behalf of the state. (And heck, they might be right, but they ought to be forming that belief based on some actual evidence, not misinformation.)
[edit: fixed that link to google search results. took about four attempts. finicky!]