Some Friday Linky for you:
Indulge your vertigo: 12 dramatic views looking down.
A surviving audio-free clip from Dead Bart – the infamous lost episode of The Simpsons with a “hyperrealistic” section:
(Dead Bart of course doesn’t exist; it seems like it was a myth made up whole-cloth in the dark depths of the internets, i.e. 4chan. Google it and see if you can find anything. Don’t know where this clip comes from really, a Spanish show maybe?)
Dogs love to sing the Law and Order theme.
Cognitive Fluency, i.e. our tendency to assume that easy = true. (via Blaise some time ago.)
Vice mag interviews the guys behind the Fighting Fantasy books. Awesome, and I love the photo.
Video of a wild 20-minute presentation at DICE that gives a pretty compelling and deeply freaky vision of what is coming – the integration of video-game logic into all human activity. I don’t buy everything he says, but surely a big chunk of this is inevitable. Earns points for figuring out before Bruce Sterling that spimes are a game platform.
The ‘Gator talks briefly about his trip to NYC here, but the highlight is this wonderful essay about one epic dining experience. For serious food lovers, and anyone who wants to know how serious food lovers see the world.
I’m with Matt Colville – why hasn’t there been a book about Jodorowsky’s never-completed film adaptation of Dune?
And speaking of film adaptations of Dune, here’s Brian Herbert and David Lynch on video together.
AV Club interviews Alia Shawkat from Arrested Development which is kinda interesting, but the best bit is the video at the end where Shawkat is in a very home-made video cover of Don’t Stop Believing with Ellen Page (Juno, Whip It) and Har Mar Superstar of all people. And it’s terrible of course, but I don’t care because they made it for Ellen Page’s mum who was retiring. Totally goofy and kinda charming.
So apparently Selleck Waterfall Sandwich is now a category of things on the internet now – Pearce just heads-up’d me to Bea Arthur mountains pizza.
A poem by Clive James, via Garrison Keillor: The book of my enemy has been remaindered
Predator dance troupe on the set of Predator 2, guest appearance by Danny Glover. That movie is under-rated, but this would have made it even betterer.
And finally… Russian (?) commercials from the 80s!
Month: February 2010
Hands off our dial!

Just back from a protest outside Parliament to protect Radio NZ, our public broadcaster. I figure about 150-200 people there, which isn’t bad for a protest pulled out of nothing on Facebook by a guy in Hamilton.
Here’s the Facebook group, with nearly 15K members as I type.
Here’s the campaign page, Hands off our dial, just launched this morning with snazzy petition to sign.
If you’re a Kiwi I reckon you should give this some support. Russel Norman said it best at the protest today – what we’re really trying to protect is our democracy, because a functional and fair democracy is only possible with a strong public-owned media.
Get involved.
nef: A Bit Rich

Finished reading the report that was in the last Friday Linky about comparative pay levels. Quality-wise it’s a mixed bag, but I appreciated it, so here’s some more thoughts.
The report is called A Bit Rich and it’s by the new economics foundation or nef (the lower-case is deliberate, frustratingly). The report is short and easy-reading, and it weaves together two strands.
First, busting myths of pay and value. The report works through ten myths surrounding pay levels for jobs, and dismantles them. The myths they attack include: “The City of London is essential for the UK economy”, “We need to pay high salaries to attract and retain talent in the UK”, and “The rich contribute more to society”.
The mythbusting is set about with vigour and usually follows the same pattern – a common-sense argument bolstered by a reference to one or maybe two pieces of supporting research. It isn’t rigorous argument, but it’s effective rhetoric because of the conflict between the common-sense argument and the myth. Take, for example, Myth 6: “The private sector is more efficient than the public sector”. This is certainly a belief that is widespread and often taken as inarguable. WikiAnswer states it baldly: “Generally the private sector is more efficient because efficiency means lower cost and more profit. The public sector doesn’t have to worry about profit so there is no incentive to be efficient.”
The common-sense argument nef gives in response simply points out that lower costs have their own price. They give the example of hospital cleaners, where profit-incentives lead to reduced cleaning quality which leads to negative health outcomes. So, efficiency measurements are misleading unless social and environmental outcomes are included. There’s nothing complex about this point, and it’s not even a new point, but it’s bracing to see it laid down here in simple language. It isn’t going to convince anyone to change their views if they have really thought about the issue, it simply doesn’t have the firepower for that, but for people who haven’t reflected on this it’s a kick in the pants about accepting received wisdom.
The other strand of the report is the case studies. Six jobs are evaluated using the social return of investment methodology, and their value to society is compared with their salary range. The jobs are deliberately chosen to be provocative, with three high-paying low-social value jobs and three low-paying high-social value jobs. Predictably, these produce deeply troubling results. City bankers destroy £7 of social value for every £1 of social value they generate, and are paid enormous sums for the privilege; childcare workers produce a net gain for society, generating £7 of social value for every £1 they are paid. The appendix discusses how these calculations were performed, and it’s not exactly rigorous. For example, the whole financial crisis and recession is laid at the feet of the City bankers and counted against them. Another example: estimated tax avoidance (to hold against the tax accountant) is referenced to some guy’s blog, and not even to a specific post on that blog.
Again, though, while it isn’t rigorous it does work as effective rhetoric, providing a clear framework for talking about how value in society works and how it is rewarded.
The main point of the report is to argue that pay disparity in the UK is far in excess of what is warranted by any reasonable metric, and to put on the table a maximum wage to balance out the minimum wage. This last idea strikes me as particularly pie-in-the-sky thinking; a legislated maximum wage is almost inconceivable in a developed capitalist country, and even if there was political will it seems unenforceable. I do, however, like the suggestion of a maximum appropriate pay ratio within an organisation, limiting the possible disparity between highest and lowest. Such a measure could only be adopted by the organisation itself, but I think it’s something interesting to talk about.
Ultimately, I enjoyed reading this report, for all its shonky under-analysis. Partly that’s because it fits my preconceptions perfectly, big ol’ lefty that I am. Partly because I think it puts an engaging and readable case on the table for reducing economic disparity within society. This is becoming a more prominent argument recently, largely thanks to Wilkinson and Pickett’s book The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. There’s definitely a move in leftish circles towards perceiving financial inequalities as problematic in and of themselves. New Labourite Peter Mandelson’s famous comment about being “intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich” has become even more problematic in hindsight.
Further, this report clearly signals the interconnectedness of the problems facing society. Economic disparity within and between communities, environmental degradation, failed governance, and the like are all joined. Like a cats cradle, when you tug on one string you inevitably find yourself tangled up in others.
Sherlock Holmes (USA/Germany, 2009)
Yes, I don’t know either why this is a USA/Germany production, but that’s what it says on IMDB.

Cal and I watched this the other day, on account of hearing consistently good reports about it, including from Mark Kermode and Simon Mayo’s movie reviews (which I discovered thanks to my recommend-me-a-podcast post). My expectations still weren’t high, on account of (a) big blockbuster action fillum (b) jude law (c) guy ritchie, but I figured that at the very least it’s always fun to watch Robert Downey jr.
It was fun! I just loved the dialogue, which raced along without drawing attention to how clever and effective it was. The cast clearly loved it, treating every line like a favourite toy. Beautiful work, really engaging, put a smile on my face.
Negative: the action scenes were as exciting as watching someone else play a video game, i.e. not at all. Thankfully there weren’t that many of them, and the rest of the time I got to revel in the fun of characters being sarcastic to each other.
I’m not even remotely a Sherlock aficionado, but I understand this portrayal of the character is relatively faithful, if rather more of an action hero and rather more of a charmer than the literary version. Importantly, this was a Holmes who was decidedly unsafe, which is an aspect of Holmes that struck me in the stories I did read and which was decidedly absent in other big-screen versions. Watson not being a buffoon = also brilliant; see this fantastic strip by Kate Beaton who you really should be reading by now anyway.
I was pleased, also, that the chemistry between Holmes and Irene came off with a decided imbalance. Holmes seemed fascinated by and powerfully drawn to her, but I didn’t get the slightest sense of romantic interest from him, whereas Irene clearly just wanted to rip his trousers off every time she was in reach. How much did Downey Jr. play out the suggestion he mentioned to such controversy, I wonder? Gay subtext or not, Holmes was never a figure of love and romance, so this was all quite acceptable.
Worth a watch, but the big-screen explodo is unengaging – wait for DVD, I reckon.
New Necklace

Beware my giant gnashers!
This is my necklace. If you’ve seen me about recently you might have noticed it hanging all sparkly-like around my neck. Cal commissioned it for our first wedding anniversary – she sees it as the boy version of her engagement ring. It’s lovely and sturdy and I’m very proud of it.
The necklace was made by Chris Cole of Chris Cole Jewellery, who also made our wedding rings. CCJ is a great little new business in Wellington – I love Chris’s work (and his attempts to popularise a brooch for men, the bro-ooch).
If you’re in Welly next weekend, you probably already have the Saturday 27th Mt Victoria Inner City Festival on your calendar – when you’re there, keep an eye out for Chris and Anne of CCJ. They’ll be right at the centre of things, on Roxburgh St, just up behind the Embassy theatre.
Thanks Chris for the amazing craftsmanship!
Thanks Cal for the amazing gift!
True Linky For Friday
I really enjoyed this funny and spirited takedown of Taylor Swift, wholesome singer/songwriter, winner of lotsa music awards, the one who Kanye generously let finish. Nail-on-head moment: “This is perhaps her music’s most grating sin: the sex-shaming girl-bashing passed off as outsider insecurity.”
Bryan Talbot’s Torquemada comic-format pick-a-path from oddball 80s comic/game hybrid Diceman, online in animated form.
A research report from the new economics foundation in the UK that develops a new metric for evaluating the worth to society of various jobs, and concludes that “Elite City bankers (earning £1 million-plus bonuses) destroy £7 of value for every £1 they create.” I’m only about half-way through the report itself but recommend you at least click through for the summary.
Incredible model photography.
Check out this game by friend-of-FromTheMorgue Matt C: Scrambled. Guide a robot through a tricky environment. Anyone who has played the boardgame Robo Rally will grok this instantly. Neat fun!
How-to guide to falling out of a plane and surviving
Infographic that powerfully demonstrates the depth of the ocean.
Infographic that powerfully demonstrates that it’s an infographic.
Yes, the 90s really did suck a whole lot: Alien 3, the Pepsi commercial
One of the things I like doing after a Friday linky is scanning the departures. I feel happy when it shows that every linky had a few people check it out. But last week there were no recorded clickthroughs on the enigmatically unexplained linky Boomdeyada. So here’s the explain: Discovery Channel made an amazing promo featuring all their scientist-types singing about what is cool about the world. Then lovely webcomic XKCD made a comic version giving props to the Discovery channel. Then someone else made an animated version of the XKCD comic. Then some other people made a new version of the song about how they love XKCD. It’s wicked. Watch all of them. And yes, that last one includes a few famous folk, at least famous in geek-type circles.
And finally… a blog devoted to analysis and discussion of men wearing gorilla suits
This One Dream I Had Once

(Found this described in the 1999 journal – March 20th. I know, I know, other people’s dreams are not interesting. I’m writing it up anyway.)
I’m in an elevator, wearing nothing but a length of tin foil that doesn’t quite go all the way around me. I realize I’m on my way to have one of those dreams where you’re standing in front of a group of people and you’re pretty much naked.
With me in the lift is a burly guy with a brown goatee, wearing only a narrow blue towel around his waist. I realize that he is on his way to his own version of the same dream.
We nod at each other.
He is wearing underwear under his towel. Seeing that my dignity is in an even more perilous state than his, he offers the underwear to me.
I am touched by his generosity, but politely decline the offer. I just couldn’t take a man’s underwear when he was about to have a dream like that. It wouldn’t be right.
The door opens. We head out in separate directions.
Podcasts
So, using my borrowed iPod, I’ve been dabbling in the world of podcasts for a while now. I like ’em because they fill up my walk to work nicely, and I don’t need to invest in good headphones to get a good experience.
I’m liking This American Life, of course. Dabbling in Adam Corolla, RadioLab, and Kermode’s film talk.
What else is good for listening? Make recommendations in the comments, if you are so moved.
[Just noticed my spam filter caught Derek’s comment – don’t panic if your comment doesn’t appear, I might have to extract it before it’ll display]
Helping Haiti For Nothing

Here’s something that amazed me recently. Customers at OneBookShelf donated over $175,000 (U.S.) to Doctors Without Borders for Haiti.
Who are these customers? People who enjoy role-playing games, not the biggest demographic. In fact, it’s a smaller slice than that – these are the people so enthusiastic they actually spend money on RPGs. And a smaller slice than that again – they are the people who keep up with online activity in the RPG industry. This is, by all rights, a tiny set of people.
That tiny set raised a pretty hefty donation sum. This happened through a fascinating initiative by the OneBookShelf people.
OneBookShelf run DriveThruRPG, an online store that sells electronic books for the RPG market. When you make a purchase, you get a download link and receive a PDF copy of the document you ordered. It sits on your computer. You can print it out if you want, but most people never do.
(The rise of the PDF market in the RPG hobby is a story in itself. It reflects the unique character of the role-playing game, and so doesn’t generalize easily to other niche industries, but there are lessons here anyway. Short version: the PDF suited the RPG hobby for two reasons:
(1) because RPGs rely on taking ideas and systems and enacting them in a dialogue-based form of play, and an electronic text supports this just as well as a physical text;
(2) because those ideas and systems are endlessly open to expansion and addition; there is always room for more chunks of content.)
Building a marketplace out of electronic products presented some challenges. In the early days of DriveThruRPG, the site indulged heavily in what is called “DRM” – digital rights management. This was an elaborate set of technical restrictions that limited your ability to copy the file. The fear was that without DRM, customers would simple email the file they purchased to all their friends, or put it up somewhere on the internet where anyone could download it without paying a cent. DriveThru’s DRM was a disaster. There was a huge outcry when users found their purchases didn’t function smoothly; the technical challenges of DRM had been met with a very clumsy solution, and DriveThru almost died before it got going. After some thought, they came up with an extremely elegant solution than has been in place for years since: when you purchase a file, it is “watermarked” with your name. Your identity is tied to the product, so if the publisher one day finds it on the internet for free download, they know exactly who is responsible. Everyone was very happy with this solution.
Electronic products also offer significant advantages that physical products can’t match. The Haiti donation total came about when OneBookShelf leveraged one of these advantages. In fact, they leveraged exactly the same feature that led to the whole DRM debacle, namely that electronic copies are in themselves valueless. An electronic file is not a “thing” that holds value in the same way a physical object does. With the click of a mouse I can have make two copies, or two-hundred.
So OneBookShelf went to its publishers and said something like “we’re going to sell a bundle of products, all revenue goes to Haiti. Can we include one of your products in the bundle?” A lot of publishers said yes. It was easy to do so – what are they actually giving away, here? Sure, you’re putting a product in someone’s hands that they might one day have paid you for – but that’s a relatively small cost. Heck, it’s even marketing – if they like product X that is in the bundle, maybe they’ll get interested and go on to purchase products Y and Z?
The bundle went on sale at $20. It included over a hundred files from over a hundred companies. Purchased separately, the bundle value would be in the region of $1300.
Response was enormous, and deservedly so. Gamers loved getting their hands on all these files for such a low price – and that, to a good cause. Publishers loved being part of such a successful and worthwhile promotion. OneBookShelf loved being at the centre of a huge charitable effort. And I’m sure DWB didn’t sneeze at $175,000 of donation money. Everyone came out happy. This was possible because the products in question were electronic files with no inherent value.
This is a fascinating sign of how the rules are changing as the world moves towards digital presentation of content over physical. Paperbacks and newspapers and vinyl won’t ever go away, but they are on their way to being secondary channels. Digital books and online news and mp3s are on the way up. The steady rise of the pocket computer will not slow down any time soon, and as this technology shift continues, the whole groundwork of content production will continue to face overhaul after overhaul. It’s exciting (and sometimes scary) times.
The music industry has for a long time been at the front end of this challenge. Music has gone digital in a big way. Most music is now downloaded, not purchased from the High Street CD store. The record companies have fought hard against this (just like they fought against cassette tapes, remember that Home Taping Is Killing Music) but it can’t be stopped. While some artists have made themselves comfortable in this new environment, the general way forward is far from clear, and the big companies are still flailing as they try to impose revenue models from retailing units that have no inherent value. There’s a lot more flailing to come.
OneBookShelf’s success with this is a straight-up challenge to the music industry, and other industries where electronic products are the norm. Imagine if, the next time there’s a crisis like Haiti, the Universal Music Group (for example) release a bundle of music for $25 – one mp3 from every artist in their enormous catalogue. They would raise millions. And everyone would walk away happy, wouldn’t they? After all, what would UMG really be sacrificing?
More than this – it’s a challenge to everyone. We need to think differently about objects, about information, about value. Time was, words only existed if they were carved in a stone or printed on paper. Words aren’t tied to a page any more. That changes everything.
Here come the linky
Q: What did Tarzan say to Jane when he saw the elephants coming?
A: Here come the elephants.
Elephant jokes are seen by many commentators as symbolic of the culture of the United States and the UK in the 1960s. Oring notes that elephant jokes dismiss conventional questions and answers, repudiate established wisdom, and reject the authority of traditional knowledge. He draws a parallel between this and the counterculture of the 1960s, stating that “disestablishment was the purpose of both,” pointing to the sexual revolution and noting that “[p]erhaps it was no accident that many of the elephant jokes emphasized the intrusion of sex into the most innocuous areas.”
Learn more about the 1960s elephant joke fad
Boomdeyada
Svend tweeted this chart that shows the relative amounts of money spent on the Iraq war, the porn industry, gift cards, and more.
Angry Norwegians in scuba gear chase after Google Street View car
Star Wars reimagined with Paris subway tickets
Wes Anderson’s Spider-Man:
NZ blogging community Public Address has been knocking it out of the park of late. Check out, in particular, Russell Brown’s examination of media coverage of the proposed national education standards, Jolisa Gracewood’s response to standards by reference to her experiences with a similar system in the U.S., and Keith Ng’s short and brutal evisceration of one of our major newspapers.
But the most incredible and positive and challenging thing I’ve read all week is Stephen’s account of why he’s decided to join a political party.
You’ve seen unhappy hipsters by now, right? What most people seem to miss is that it’s a scathing attack on the aesthetics of one magazine, Dwell, rather than a general comment about architecture magazines or, indeed, hipsters. It’s hilarious, though. The Dwell aesthetic is far from uncommon in the designosphere.
Have I linkied before to the Crappy DVD Bootleg Covers flickr pool? I don’t think I have.
And finally… My First Dictionary