Alien Prometheus

All right. I am about to indulge in some full-throttle nerdery.

I’ve been watching over the last 3 days the trailer-trailers for Prometheus, the new science fiction film from Ridley Scott. It is set in the same world as his hugely influential film Alien.

The trailer-trailer displays a continuity of physical design, with people in Moebius-like spacesuits trudging through Giger interior spaces; the sound mix throws in the shocking and intense Alien note that anchored the very first trailers for the 1979 film. Heck, even the typeface is the same as that from the first Alien (and the Prometheus title echoes Jim Cameron’s 1986 sequel Aliens).

The early news of an Alien Prequel didn’t seem to fill many people with joy. The alien creatures seem played-out thanks to two lacklustre crossover films, and Ridley Scott himself is famously uneven in his output. But Scott’s approach has generated interest. He is exploring other aspects of the mysteries raised in the first film – namely, the nature of the “space jockey”, the enormous elephantine fossil encountered by the doomed explorers. The famous phallic-headed dual-jawed chest-violating alien, Scott says, will play no part in the new film.

Complaints about his uneven filmic record aside, it must be understood that Ridley Scott is the only person who could make this story happen. No other filmmaker could get blockbuster money behind a science fiction film that is “a prequel to Alien but without the alien”. From the perspective of the Hollywood system, this would be an anti-movie, almost a Zen koan, an idea that utterly negates itself. Only for Ridley does it make sense. He can muster the finances with his reputation, and assert a new direction for Prometheus because he is the creator.

(At least, he is seen as the creator. Alien was of course a group project. O’Bannon, Giler & Hill all have a very strong claim to creation of the ideas explored herein. Giler and Hill are on board as producers, and O’Bannon – who always lamented the lack of recognition he received for his part in the film – passed away two years ago.)

I find the concept of Prometheus, as so described, incredibly enticing. The first Alien film was a monster-in-a-dark-house flick, but undertaken so grandly and in such a violatory manner that the alien creature seized a place as a cultural nightmare. But the film raised many other questions; there was a whole biologicial technology in evidence that was truly alien, whose provenance and purpose was left unexamined. Thematically, this was the ground on which the B-movie monster stalked. The idea of alien-ness – the beauty and terror of the deeply different – was portrayed in a dense ecology of incomprehensible detail, all clearly part of some unreadable plan. A monster rose up and killed the film’s lonely humans, but the message was not that alien life is inimical to human life; the message was that alien life is not measurable against human life. These are different orders of nature, existing at right angles to each other. And, by extension, the message was that humans are not the masters of all they survey. Even these star-spanning future humans command only a small and humble domain. It’s a message of warning against hubris. We humans are just one limited mode of seeing in a universe which makes no room for us. Or, shorter: we do not matter.

(There are clear parallels to the (heavily picked over) Lovecraftian Cthulhu mythos, where the fundamental secret about the dark alien gods is that they do not care about humanity; our inability to comprehend our cosmic insignificance tends to deliver us into madness.)

All of these elements were left unexplored in the other films in the series, which instead took the route of using the implacable alien creatures as symbolic engines, on which to layer this or that human-vs-? metaphor. In the second movie, they became the fourth-generation soldiers who eschewed a traditional battlefield and thereby negated military power and all the structures of hierarchy and control so embedded (referencing Vietnam & Afghanistan in the 70s). In the third movie, they became the idea of contamination, both in the sense of infectious disease, and of dangerous and wrong thoughts. In the fourth movie, they became (curiously enough) nature, or more precisely biological systems that through sheer complexity do not submit themselves to human control; and reproductive systems, the propagation of the human race, most of all.

There’s much to value in this approach, but the power of the first film was very much located in the directness of its meaning: the alien elements represented themselves.

Scott has noted in his discussion of Prometheus that the space jockey was untouched by the other films. Truth. But the mystery of the space jockey has been addressed in a number of ancillary stories. Of course none of these “matter”, but they can serve as examples against which we can measure Prometheus and speculate about what ground it might cover.

Thanks to licensing requirements, in all of these stories, the “Aliens” title is dominant, and as a result, the Giger creatures are inevitably prominent. In the extremely good 1980s comics written by Mark Verheiden, the space jockey is a conquerer, using the aliens to subjugate worlds (and this fate ultimately befalls our earth). In the less-well-known novel Aliens: Original Sin, the space jockey is one of a species of negotiators, entering a mutually beneficial trade deal with a human network. And in the even less well-known (and abandoned unfinished) comic series Aliens: Apocalypse – The Destroying Angels, human explorers discover that the space jockeys once dominated the galaxy using aliens as tools, with pre-human earth as part of their domain.

It will be curious to see how Scott charts his own course outward from the space jockey data given in the film; and
more pointedly, the way he uses these elements in a thematic and symbolic way. It’s also worth noting that the designers of the first Alien film deliberately loaded the space jockey with a specific symbolic weight. They tried to evoke positive feelings, sympathy and respect. It wasn’t meant as a threatening image, and had a kind of nobility to it. These were deliberate design choices, to contrast with the cold, unyielding threat of the other, nastier kind of alien.

(In the original schema for Alien, the space jockey was to be clearly portrayed as an innocent victim of the aliens; but script simplifications transformed this poor victim into the pilot of a craft carrying a cargo of deadly aliens, the very creatures that destroyed it. The ambiguity around the space jockey’s relationship to the cargo adds greatly to the sense of mystery, and immediately complicates any moral message. The original story would have been a lesser film on this count at least.)

So. As noted above, I find the concept enticing, and recognise that there is much to explore with the elements Scott has chosen as his focus. However, I am feeling great trepidation.

Because of the face.

It’s the central image in the poster, and was the first image released as a publicity still: a giant human face in an alien environment. This sets off enormous, raucous alarm bells for me.

See also the tagline from the poster: “The search for our beginning could lead to our end.” Our beginning? In another interview Scott namechecked Eric Von Daniken, whose Chariots of the Gods supposed that alien beings came to earth and taught us new technology. Is that what he’s doing here?

The face is not alien. The face denotes a different order of mystery, one that loops tightly back to earth and history of the human race – a tiny segment of time on one tiny planet in one corner of a vast universe. The face is hubris. The face asserts that in the vast deeps of space, among species whose nature we can only guess at, we still matter. We are not nothing – we are everything.

This, to me, is the biggest danger posed by Prometheus. Put another way: the message of Alien is, not everything is about us. I fear that Prometheus will show that Alien was about us, after all.

That would be a tragic reconfiguration of the 1979 film. And while the Alien films will always sit there pristine (if they can survive a Predator giving a helicopter ride to an Giger Alien, they can survive this), whenever I engage with them from now on I will hear Prometheus talking at me.

I hope it says the right things.

Xmas Linky

So. Christmas. Some things. If you are still at work, here is your skiving material for the rest of the week.

Why the Arabic language is cool.

Make everything OK
Make everything blow up

Photos: the generation gap

War in computer games, and what it tells us about the invisibility of real war (fantastic essay, this)

X-Men a la Tintin

This is not circulating as widely as it ought to be: this is how you respond to a powerful bigot.

Why programmers work at night

25 clever household tips that are actually bloody useful (via Norm)

Via d3vo: Is it old? The above link: “ridiculously old”.

Xmas interview with the Nek Minnit guy manages to be one of the most sensible & human things you will encounter in the mainstream media this whole season.

via StarlaJo: sKate Bush

Correlation & causation (via Michael U)

Why do people defend unjust systems?

The wealthy do not create jobs. Sorry, Thatcherite/Republican ideologues. Two great essays from the last week: Potlatch, Business Insider. Different and complementary. One of them via Svend, the other via who knows.

Not unrelated: Hot waitress economic index

Superman’s jawline as an indicator of the American cultural mood

And finally… this:

MERRY CHRISTMASTIMES

Walky Linky

Wee Willa, she is walking these days. Rest of this post achieved in gaps between chasing her around the house.

Auckland newspaper columnist mocked in the style of NZ literary classics. (The Magpie is my favourite.)

New York Times feedback: 8-year-old lists his top 10 composers, with helpful illustration.

Biostatistics Ryan Gosling

The terrible secret of Tom Bombadil. LotR scholars/nerds should find this enjoyable, if perhaps infuriating.

Pulp Fiction in chronological order.

Via Kate Kenworthy – a palliative care worker identifies the five top regrets of the dying.

Visualising everything Facebook knows about you.

This has made me smile about as much as Willa walking, which is a whole lot: Scotland’s Hurricane Bawbag

Turns out that sworddance video was a viral for a Major Lazer track

John Stamos guide to cuddling:

Almost my favourite John Stamos thing in the world.

8-year-old writes to creator of Tintin, gets reply, begins long correspondence. This story starts great but gets better and better, and finishes with a Maurice Sendak anecdote that might be the best anecdote in the world.

Family Guy writer describes getting arrested at Occupy. Yes. The Awl presents a great essay about Occupy that puts appropriate emphasis on how the “newsworthy” thing about police misconduct here is it’s directed at white people. Also: how Republicans are being taught to talk about Occupy.

What children’s paintings would look like if drawn realistically

Cello Wars

And finally, via d3vo: Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo.

Difficult Linky

Learn how to interpret Regular Expressions the hard way.

The New Yorker’s famously picky cartoon editor has found the perfect cartoon.

Steve Leon showed me this clip of Herman Cain, US Republican would-be Presidential candidate, overdubbed with… words. That match the movements of his lips. It’s a thing. And it made me guffaw I tell you.

Gareth Michael-Skarka begins his “Insurgent Creative” advent series – want to get your creative stuff out into the world? Don’t know how to do every single thing yourself? The resources you need are out there. Share the knowledge.

The mysterious creator of book sculptures in Edinburgh has left her last anonymous gift. If you haven’t encountered this story yet, you oughta make with the clicky, it’s marvellous.

How not to market science to girls

Beer advertising campaign tries to mind-control women (a doctoral thesis could be written on unpacking this)

23 legendary album covers recreated in Lego

Adding animation to classic comic covers (this one has been all over the place because it’s quite neat)

Via sokpuppet – using dancers instead of Powerpoint:

Scooby-Doo & secular humanism – no really, you want to read this.

And finally… Barack Obama Son of Strelka Son of God word collage weird stories thingamy.

Good for the Greens

Three years ago, I was disillusioned about the low % of votes cast for the Green party, despite what I thought was a perfect set of conditions for them to thrive. “Is 7% as high as it’s ever going to get? Will the Green party always be this small?”

Turns out the people in the comments who said, nope, it can go bigger – they were right. The Green vote is sitting around 11% this time around.

It’s a marvellous result for them, even if it sits in the context of an election result that doesn’t give much to celebrate – very low turnout, a savage defeat for the main opposition Labour party, key losses for the left in almost every close electorate contest, and (most galling) the ridiculous spectacle of consummate politician (and political opportunist) Winston Peters riding in at the last moment and polling nearly 7% in doing so.

It’s a clear success for the new approach taken by the Greens, a careful don’t-scare-the-horses, friendlier-to-business model that has drawn a lot of criticism from their base. Ultimately I’m comfortable with this; given the failure of the big parties to engage with urgent environmental problems, the Greens need to be a party of influence, and if they have to sell some of their soul to get there then that seems like a political calculation they need to make.

A less-scary Green party also opens up space on the left for a true social justice party to come in and be vocal about those causes. The Mana party is the first shot at this, but I’m not yet confident it can hold together under the strain of the big personalities at its core; only winning one seat might be a blessing for the longer game.

Anyway. The country voted John Key back into power, despite polls showing they don’t really like his policies and don’t really know much about the rest of his party. That’s not a great endorsement for the NZ version of democracy, I guess.

Gonna be a tough three years.

(I also predicted “Many inside the Nats are eager to get on with their 90s-era project while they have their hands on the tiller. Expect big battles inside the National party as the ideologues take on the pragmatists.” – and the view from the outside is that I was wrong about that. There might be battles inside the party but almost nothing has leaked out into public view, it’s all a united front behind that nice Mr Keys. Anyway, with a second term won while openly campaigning on asset sales and welfare reform, the pragmatists and ideologues now find themselves happily in alignment. The waiting game has worked out beautifully for them.)

Golden Claws Linky

(This post is an election-free zone, Kiwis. Take a break, grab a cuppa, and make with the clicky.)

Thanks to the kindness of one @BKDrinkwater, I saw a movie in a cinema yesterday (second time this year! Whoop!) – it was Tintin, and it was fun, though I can see why the purists were furious – it was definitely a movie interpretation of Tintin, not just an adaptation. After which, some Wiki clicking revealed that there was a 1947 stop motion adaptation of the adventure Crab With The Golden Claws. Fascinating. Would love to see that.

Achewood is back! Don’t start with the most recent strip though. And don’t start at the start. Start… um… I dunno where. Randomly.

I haven’t even watched this yet but it’s getting muchas sharing by people who comment stuff like “amazing” and “so cool” so I reckon it’ll be worth your time.

Address Is Approximate from The Theory on Vimeo.

What have those Muppets been auditioning for?

Watch while you can: song medley at the Jim Henson memorial service. Clips from this incredible event never stay up on YouTube for long. This is wondrous and a bit heartbreaking.

Found that via the AV Club’s ongoing retrospective of the classic Muppet Show – which also makes the entirely accurate claim that Rita Moreno performing Fever is “one of the best of the best segments of any TV variety show ever”. Watch it. 2 minutes of incredible.

And while Muppeting: Muppets audition for the part of Yoda

Disturbing LEGO insight

You Are Not So Smart does social insight, small groups, the Robbers Cave experiment, and a whole bunch of good stuff that I love.

Fascinating overview of the story of the online alternative currency BitCoin at Wired.

Great feature journalism: the men who maintain the Forth Bridge.

How Adbusters started the worldwide Occupy movement. And here’s a nice summary of what Occupy is all about.

Octopus thinking. I love octopus stories. This story is an example of why. (via Emma)

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic cosplay. I haven’t watched this show so I’m not a brony. But it sounds like a good time.

And finally… India talent show

Gag-a-minute Linky

People liked something I put on Twitter during the deeply weird events of yesterday morning in NZ politics. It ended up on the Listener blog even (at 1pm). The best bit is that not ten minutes after I wrote that our PM came out with a line that really did sound like it was scripted by the greatest satirist of the antipodes:
“Key was asked if the investigation was an appropriate use of police resources.
‘The good thing is we’ve lowered the crime rate by seven per cent across the country so they do have a little bit of spare time'” (Source)

Humour is a funny thing. (See what I did there?) I’ve always been fascinated by the behind-the-scenes of laugh-getting, the hard graft that goes into working up a gag. Twitter itself is a bit like a giant gag-writer’s room, everyone chucking ideas and variants at the wall until something sticks. There was a great This American Life that looked inside the writer’s room for The Onion, and I’ve been listening lately to Robin & Josie’s Utter Shambles, which is a charming podcast that always seems to end up in a discussion about the nature of comedy-as-work. It’s an inside-baseball look at how comedians interact with each other and position themselves in relation to the rest of the world, and a reminder of just how distinctive is the comedian’s role in society. Highly recommended. The Alan Moore episode is great as a starting point, it’s how I got in.

The usual gang of idiots from MAD magazine had a reunion. Also: Podcast interview with Al Jaffee, who at age 90 is still drawing the fold-in at the back of the mag. Amaaaazing.

Bret McKenzie talks to the NYT about writing songs for the Muppet movie. Like this one:

Gnat questions the value of a degree in computer science vs. getting out into a startup. He’s been losing his former confidence in what was the right course of action. Of interest if you are, or someone you know is, heading towards university age and looking towards a career in coding.

Draw a Stickman

Graphic designer takes issue with that kerning game linked last week

Guy has the script for John Boorman’s 1970 attempt to film Lord of the Rings. He takes you through it. Sounds… wacky. And very 1970s.

Early Star Wars scripts! See how Lucas’s ideas evolved, if you have the patience. I’m more curious why no-one has tried to make a fan-film of one of these early versions…

Ayn Rand: she really, really admired a brutal murderer. Woman had issues.

Film critic Hulk on Happy-Go-Lucky. The all-caps Hulk-speak is exhausting, but stick with it if you’ve seen this film, because this is easily the smartest thing i’ve ever seen written about Mike Leigh’s semi-masterpiece.

The McRib as arbitrage.

Via Ivan: earliest known prank phone call. 1884.

Naomi Klein writes very damn well about climate vs capitalism. Highly highly recommended.

And finally, via Hannah, put some Caruso in your Christmas. Coincidentally, this is the five-year anniversary of when I put this gem in a Friday linky:

Election ’11: Something you can do

In our MMP electoral system, every vote matters.

Social psychology tells us that the biggest influence on our behaviour is the behaviour of people we know.

Our day-to-day social groups usually share our opinions on political matters, but Facebook (and, to a lesser extent, other social media tools) connects many of us to people beyond this.

So here’s a simple thing you can do before the election: announce on social media how you’re going to vote. Perhaps also say why if you can sum it up in a sentence. No big song and dance required, no need to engage in arguments if people reply. Just speak up.

It will count.

D&D for MMP

On Saturday I helped out for a few hours at the D&D for MMP fundraiser, in which some very game folks embarked on a 24-hour D&D marathon to fundraise for the Campaign for MMP.

MMP, for those outside of NZ, is our current proportional electoral system, which is coming under the eye of a national referendum. I think it’s likely to romp comfortably home, but complacency is not a good idea when there are some well-funded opposing forces with an interest in decreasing the fairness of our democracy.

My role was to sit down with my friend Ben and run the social media for 4 hours, 4pm to 8pm – a live update stream, Twitter, Facebook, and the blog. We had a good ol’ time, and reviewing the 24 hours it is clear our stint was, er, the least reverent.

(I can’t access the livestream right now to find it but I recall being particularly pleased by a comment speculating that the monstrous Owlbear was created after an owl and a bear sat down for a cup of tea in Epsom.)

The event raised about $2000 which is very nice for a grassroots campaign to have. It also seemed to get some nice profile-raising media out of the event – hopefully that translates into a few more dollars and votes.

It was a fun time, and nice to contribute to the bigger picture for a change, something that’s been very hard to do while having adventures in nappyland.